Xss Cross Site Scripting in Buffalo with Dynamodb
Xss Cross Site Scripting in Buffalo with Dynamodb — how this specific combination creates or exposes the vulnerability
Cross-site scripting (XSS) in a Buffalo application that uses DynamoDB typically arises when data stored in DynamoDB is rendered in HTML or JavaScript without proper escaping. Because DynamoDB is a NoSQL database, it does not enforce schema-level escaping; it stores whatever you write. If your Buffalo app writes user-controlled input into DynamoDB and later injects that data into HTML templates or JSON responses without context-aware escaping, reflected or stored XSS can occur.
In Buffalo, handlers often retrieve items from DynamoDB using the AWS SDK for Go, then pass data to HTML templates via the Assign method. If the template does not auto-escape or the developer marks content as safe, an attacker-supplied value containing <script> or event handlers can execute in victims’ browsers. Common patterns that lead to XSS include:
- Storing raw HTML or script-like strings in DynamoDB attributes (e.g.,
comment,bio). - Returning DynamoDB item attributes as JSON in HTTP responses and having the client render them with
innerHTMLwithout sanitization. - Using unescaped user input in error or status messages that are rendered in the UI.
Because DynamoDB does not perform server-side templating, the security boundary is enforced by the application layer. A missing escape in a Buffalo template or an unsafe JavaScript render path can turn a benign DynamoDB entry into an XSS vector. This is especially risky when combined with dynamic route parameters or query values that are written to DynamoDB and later reflected in the UI.
Dynamodb-Specific Remediation in Buffalo — concrete code fixes
Remediation focuses on preventing untrusted data from being interpreted as code when rendered. In Buffalo, ensure that all data from DynamoDB is escaped according to the context where it is used (HTML, attribute, JavaScript, or URL). Below are concrete code examples for safe handling.
1. Safe HTML rendering with Buffalo templates
Buffalo’s plush templates auto-escape variables by default. Always rely on that behavior and avoid marking content as safe unless you have sanitized it.
package actions
import (
"github.com/gobuffalo/buffalo"
"github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go/service/dynamodb"
)
func ShowComment(c buffalo.Context) error {
id := c.Param("comment_id")
// Fetch item from DynamoDB
out, err := db.Get(&dynamodb.GetItemInput{
TableName: aws.String("Comments"),
Key: map[string]*dynamodb.AttributeValue{
"id": {S: aws.String(id)},
},
})
if err != nil {
return c.Render(500, r.Error(err))
}
comment := *out.Item["content"].S
// plush auto-escapes {{ comment }} — no extra work needed
return c.Render(200, plush.Render("comments/show.plush", plush.Data{"comment": comment}))
}
2. JSON responses and client-side rendering
If your Buffalo API returns JSON that the client renders, escape on the client or sanitize server-side. Do not rely on content security policy alone.
package actions
import (
"github.com/gobuffalo/buffalo"
"github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go/service/dynamodb"
"encoding/json"
"net/http"
)
func CommentAPI(c buffalo.Context) error {
id := c.Param("comment_id")
out, err := db.Get(&dynamodb.GetItemInput{
TableName: aws.String("Comments"),
Key: map[string]*dynamodb.AttributeValue{
"id": {S: aws.String(id)},
},
})
if err != nil {
return c.Render(500, r.Error(err))
}
comment := *out.Item["content"].S
// Ensure content is safe for HTML context if rendered client-side
safeComment := html.EscapeString(comment)
return c.Render(200, c.JSON(struct {
Content string `json:"content"`
}{Content: safeComment}))
}
3. Sanitization for rich text (if required)
If you must store and render limited HTML, sanitize on write or read using a library like bluemonday. Do not store unsanitized HTML in DynamoDB unless necessary.
package actions
import (
"github.com/microcosm-cc/bluemonday"
"github.com/aws/aws-sdk-go/service/dynamodb"
)
var policy = bluemonday.UGCPolicy()
func SaveComment(c buffalo.Context) error {
raw := c.Param("content")
safe := policy.Sanitize(raw)
_, err := db.Put(&dynamodb.PutItemInput{
TableName: aws.String("Comments"),
Item: map[string]*dynamodb.AttributeValue{
"id": {S: aws.String(c.Param("id"))},
"content": {S: aws.String(safe)},
},
})
if err != nil {
return c.Render(500, r.Error(err))
}
return c.Redirect(302, "/comments")
}
4. Context-aware escaping in JavaScript
If client-side JavaScript renders DynamoDB data, use a DOM-safe method. Avoid innerHTML with untrusted data; prefer textContent or a sanitizer like DOMPurify.
// Unsafe:
// element.innerHTML = commentFromDynamoDB;
// Safe:
const node = document.createTextNode(commentFromDynamoDB);
element.appendChild(node);
5. Validation and schema design
Use DynamoDB type constraints and application-level validation to limit stored content. For example, enforce length limits and disallow control characters that may aid injection chains. Combine this with regular security scans using tools that check for XSS and other issues across your API surface.
Related CWEs: inputValidation
| CWE ID | Name | Severity |
|---|---|---|
| CWE-20 | Improper Input Validation | HIGH |
| CWE-22 | Path Traversal | HIGH |
| CWE-74 | Injection | CRITICAL |
| CWE-77 | Command Injection | CRITICAL |
| CWE-78 | OS Command Injection | CRITICAL |
| CWE-79 | Cross-site Scripting (XSS) | HIGH |
| CWE-89 | SQL Injection | CRITICAL |
| CWE-90 | LDAP Injection | HIGH |
| CWE-91 | XML Injection | HIGH |
| CWE-94 | Code Injection | CRITICAL |