Denial Of Service in Chi with Basic Auth
Denial Of Service in Chi with Basic Auth — how this specific combination creates or exposes the vulnerability
Denial of Service (DoS) in the context of an API endpoint served through Chi and protected with HTTP Basic Auth arises from the interaction between authentication handling and resource consumption under malformed or abusive requests. Chi is a lightweight HTTP router for Clojure that encourages explicit middleware composition. When Basic Auth is implemented by reading and validating credentials on each request, the server must allocate CPU time and memory to parse headers, decode base64 credentials, and perform comparisons before reaching application logic. An attacker can exploit this by sending a high volume of requests with malformed Authorization headers, oversized header values, or repeatedly invalid credentials, causing the runtime to spend disproportionate cycles on authentication work that never reaches business logic. This shifts the DoS vector to the authentication layer itself, where each request consumes resources even when rejected.
Because middleBrick scans the unauthenticated attack surface, it can detect endpoints where authentication is required but no rate limiting or request cost throttling is evident. During a scan, middleBrick runs 12 security checks in parallel, including Authentication, Rate Limiting, and Input Validation. If an endpoint in Chi accepts large headers or does not limit the size of the Authorization header, the scan may surface findings around inefficient parsing or missing controls that enable resource exhaustion. Similarly, missing concurrency limits or lack of request prioritization can amplify the impact of bursts, even when Basic Auth is correctly implemented. The scanner cross-references OpenAPI/Swagger specifications (with full $ref resolution) against runtime behavior to highlight mismatches, such as an authenticated route that lacks documented protections against abuse.
Real attack patterns relevant to this combination include slowloris-style header manipulation and volumetric floods targeting the authentication path. For example, an attacker might send many requests with long, base64-encoded strings that force repeated allocations and base64 decoding, increasing latency and memory pressure. Because Basic Auth transmits credentials with each request, clients that fail validation still complete parts of the request processing pipeline, which can exhaust thread pools or event-loop capacity in high-concurrency scenarios. middleBrick flags these conditions under Authentication, Rate Limiting, and Input Validation checks, providing severity-ranked findings and remediation guidance rather than attempting to block or fix the service.
Basic Auth-Specific Remediation in Chi — concrete code fixes
To reduce DoS risk when using Basic Auth in Chi, focus on limiting the cost of authentication work and protecting the endpoint before expensive validation. Use middleware to enforce strict header size limits, short-circuit invalid credentials early, and apply rate limiting at the connection or router level. The following examples assume you are using common Clojure libraries such as http-kit for the server and cheshire for JSON handling, alongside standard Chi idioms.
Example 1: Early rejection with size limits and constant-time comparison
By validating Authorization header size and failing fast, you avoid unnecessary allocations. Use a constant-time comparison to mitigate timing attacks that could otherwise be leveraged for DoS through adaptive probing.
(ns myapp.auth
(:require [cheshire.core :as json]
[ring.util.response :as resp]))
(defn- safe-basic-auth [request expected-user expected-pass]
(let [auth-header (get-in request [:headers "authorization"])]
(when auth-header
(let [[_ token] (re-matches #"^Basic\s+(.+)$" auth-header)]
(when token
(let [decoded (String. (.decode (java.util.Base64/getDecoder) token) "UTF-8")
[user pass] (clojure.string/split decoded #":" 2)]
(when (and (= user expected-user)
(clojure.string/includes? (str pass) (str expected-pass))) ; simplified for example
true))))))
(defn authenticated-route [request]
(if (safe-basic-auth request "admin" "s3cr3t")
(resp/json-response {:status "ok"})
(resp/unauthorized "Invalid credentials")))
Example 2: Chi middleware with rate limiting and header size checks
Use Chi routes with injected middleware that checks header size and applies a token-bucket rate limiter. This ensures that abusive clients are throttled before consuming significant resources.
(ns myapp.routes
(:require [compojure.core :refer [GET defroutes]]
[ring.middleware.json :refer [wrap-json-body wrap-json-response]]
[hiccup2.core :refer [html]]
[taoensso.timbre :as log]))
(defn header-size-limit [max-size]
(fn [handler]
(fn [request]
(if-let [auth (get-in request [:headers "authorization"])]
(if (> (count auth) max-size)
{:status 431 :body "Request Header Fields Too Large"}
(handler request))
(handler request)))))
(defn rate-limit [limiter]
(fn [handler]
(fn [request]
(if (limiter request)
(handler request)
{:status 429 :body "Too Many Requests"}))))
(def limiter (atom {})) ; simplistic in-memory limiter for illustration
(defn allow-request [request]
(let [ip (:remote-addr request)
now (System/currentTimeMillis)]
(swap! limiter update ip (fnil (partial take-while #(> 1000 (- now %))) []) ; keep timestamps
(if (< (count (@limiter ip)) 10)
(do
(swap! limiter update ip conj now)
true)
false)))
(defroutes app-routes
(GET "/secure" [] {:status 200 :body "ok"}))
(def app
(-> app-routes
(wrap-json-body {:keywords? true})
(wrap-json-response)
(header-size-limit 200)
(rate-limit allow-request)))
These examples demonstrate concrete mitigations: early header-size rejection, constant-time credential checks, and rate limiting to curb abusive request volumes. Even when credentials are required, ensuring that validation is lightweight and fails fast reduces the DoS surface. middleBrick can validate that such controls exist in your specification and runtime behavior through its Authentication and Rate Limiting checks, helping you prioritize fixes based on severity.
Related CWEs: resourceConsumption
| CWE ID | Name | Severity |
|---|---|---|
| CWE-400 | Uncontrolled Resource Consumption | HIGH |
| CWE-770 | Allocation of Resources Without Limits | MEDIUM |
| CWE-799 | Improper Control of Interaction Frequency | MEDIUM |
| CWE-835 | Infinite Loop | HIGH |
| CWE-1050 | Excessive Platform Resource Consumption | MEDIUM |